Disposable grasper-integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal in transplanted patients; focus on feasibility, safety, and patient experience. Results and micro-cost analysis from a tertiary referral center.

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ureteral stent removal (SR) using a grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope (giFC-Isiris ®, Coloplast ®) after kidney transplantation (KT), with a focus on feasibility, safety, patient experience, and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive KT undergoing SR through giFC were prospectively enrolled from January 2020 to June 2023. Patient characteristics, KT and SR details, urine culture results, antimicrobial prescriptions, and the incidence of urinary tract infections (UTI) within 1 month were recorded. A micro-cost analysis was conducted, making a comparison with the costs of SR with a reusable FC and grasper. RESULTS: A total of 136 KT patients were enrolled, including both single and double KT, with 148 stents removed in total. The median indwelling time was 34 days [26, 47]. SR was successfully performed in all cases. The median preparation and procedure times were 4 min [3,5]. and 45 s[30, 60], respectively. The median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was 3 [1, 5], and 98.2% of patients expressed willingness to undergo the procedure again. Only one episode of UTI involving the graft (0.7%) was recorded. Overall, the estimated cost per SR procedure with Isiris ® and the reusable FC was 289.2€ and 151,4€, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective series evaluated the use of Isiris ® for SR in a cohort of KT patients, demonstrating feasibility and high tolerance. The UTI incidence was 0.7% within 1 month. Based on the micro-cost analysis, estimated cost per procedure favored the reusable FC.

Potential health risks of microplastic fibres release from disposable surgical masks: Impact of repeated wearing and handling.

Disposable surgical masks undeniably provide important personal protection in daily life, but the potential health risks by the release of microplastic fibres from masks should command greater attention. In this study, we conducted a microplastic fibre release simulation experiment by carrying masks in a pocket and reusing them, to reveal the number and morphological changes of microfibres released. Fourier transform infrared spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy, and optical microscopy were employed to analyse the physical and chemical characteristics of the mask fibres. The results indicated that the reuse of disposable masks led to a significant release of microplastic fibres, potentially leading to their migration into the respiratory system. Furthermore, the release of microplastic fibres increased with prolonged external friction, particularly when masks were stored in pockets. The large-scale release of microplastic fibres due to mask reuse raises concerns about potential health risks to the human respiratory system. The reuse of disposable masks should be also strictly avoided in daily life in the future. Furthermore, the current study also established a robust foundation for future research endeavours on health risks associated with microplastic fibres entering the respiratory system through improper mask usage.

Illumination matters Part III: Impact of light obstruction on illuminance from flexible ureteroscopes - a comparative PEARLS analysis.

PURPOSE: Artifacts from poor ureteroscopes' light design with shadowing and dark areas in the field of view have been reported. The aim was to quantify effects of light obstruction in a kidney calyx model. METHODS: We evaluated a series of contemporary flexible ureteroscopes including the Storz Flex-Xc and Flex-X2s, Olympus V3 and P7, Pusen 7.5F and 9.2F, as well as OTU Wiscope using an enclosed 3D-printed pink in vitro kidney calyx model submerged in saline, where the field of light was intentionally partially obstructed alternatively at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock. A color spectrometer was used for illuminance measurements at a 45° opening position in the background of the model. RESULTS: Overall and mean background illuminance for each obstructive situation were significantly different between scopes for both 50% and 100% brightness settings (ANOVA p < 0.001). At 50% brightness setting, almost all scopes had their highest and lowest background illuminance with the 6 o'clock and 3 o'clock obstructive situation, respectively. At 100% brightness setting, these became 6 o'clock and 12 o'clock obstructive situations. Considering each obstructive situation individually, the Flex-Xc was consistently the scope with highest background illuminance and the Pusen 7.5F the lowest. Background illuminance for each obstructive situation varied significantly for each scope individually, with the greatest range of variability for Pusen 7.5F and V3. CONCLUSIONS: Illuminance performance of ureteroscopes within an obstructed calyx model differ significantly for various obstructive situations. Urologists should be aware of this to help guide their choice of ureteroscope.

A systematic review comparing the safety, cost and carbon footprint of disposable and reusable laparoscopic devices.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review of the literature is to compare a selection of currently utilized disposable and reusable laparoscopic medical devices in terms of safety (1st criteria), cost and carbon footprint. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search was carried out on electronic databases for articles published up until 6 May 2022. The eligible works were prospective (randomized or not) or retrospective clinical or medical-economic comparative studies having compared disposable scissors, trocars, and mechanical endoscopic staplers to the same instruments in reusable. Two different independent examiners extracted the relevant data. RESULTS: Among the 2882 articles found, 156 abstracts were retained for examination. After comprehensive analysis concerning the safety and effectiveness of the instruments, we included four articles. A study on trocars highlighted increased vascular complications with disposable instruments, and another study found more perioperative incidents with a hybrid stapler as opposed to a disposable stapler. As regards cost analysis, we included 11 studies, all of which showed significantly higher costs with disposable instruments. The results of the one study on carbon footprints showed that hybrid instruments leave four times less of a carbon footprint than disposable instruments. CONCLUSION: The literature on the theme remains extremely limited. Our review demonstrated that from a medical and economic standpoint, reusable medical instruments, particularly trocars, presented appreciable advantages. While there exist few data on the ecological impact, those that do exist are unmistakably favorable to reusable instruments.

Revising a laparoscopic appendicectomy set to reduce reliance on disposable surgical instruments: supporting the transition to sustainable surgical practice.

INTRODUCTION: After excluding anaesthetic gases, around one-third of carbon emissions from surgical procedures are from consumables. This sustainable quality improvement project revised the laparoscopic appendicectomy surgical set at a large teaching hospital, with the aim of reducing unnecessary usage of disposable laparoscopic ports and surgical instruments. METHODS: A prospective audit of 25 consecutive laparoscopic appendicectomies (5% of annual appendicectomies performed at the Trust) was conducted to assess use of disposable instruments. The financial and environmental costs of the five most commonly used disposable instruments were calculated and annual cost of current practice determined. A revised surgical set was created to include additional reusable instruments and new reusable ports. A reaudit of disposable surgical instrument usage was conducted and the financial and environmental impact of the new set compared with the results from the initial audit. RESULTS: A total of 109 disposable instruments were opened in 25 appendicectomies, costing an estimated £49,656 and 692kg CO2 equivalent (CO2e) annually. Following rollout of the revised appendicectomy set, there was a significant reduction in disposable instrument usage (median four versus one instruments per case, p<0.00001). The revised set is predicted to reduce annual disposable instrument usage from 2,180 to 705 instruments (68% reduction), saving £219,452 and 3.02 tonnes CO2e over the estimated seven-year lifecycle of the reusable instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Updating a laparoscopic appendicectomy set to include additional/new reusable instruments can lead to a marked reduction in disposable surgical instrument usage. This results in significant projected financial and CO2e savings.

User experience of wearing comfort of reusable versus disposable surgical gowns and environmental perspectives: A cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the user experience of wearing comfort of reusable sterile surgical gowns and compare these gowns with conventional disposable surgical gowns. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: An academic hospital in the Netherlands. POPULATION: Gynaecologists, surgeons, residents and operating room assistants (n=80). METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained via a written questionnaire. Participants provided subjective comments and scored the reusable gown on each individual topic with a score from 1 to 5 (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent) and compared the reusable gown with the conventional disposable alternative (better, equal or worse). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wearing comfort: ventilation and temperature regulation, fit and length, functionality, barrier function and ease of use. RESULTS: The results of the overall scores of the reusable gown are scored as 'very good' (mean 4.3, SD ± 0.5) by its users. Regarding comparison of the gowns, more than 79% (lowest score 79%, highest score 95%) of the participants scored the reusable gown equal or higher on six of seven topics. The topic 'ease of use' was scored equal or higher by 59% of the participants. Subjective comments provided information on possible improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate that there is professional acceptance regarding the utilisation of reusable surgical gowns. To facilitate broader adoption, it is imperative to foster collaboration among suppliers and healthcare institutions. The reusable surgical gown is an environmentally sustainable, safe and comfortable alternative in the operating room.

Single-Use Lens Compromise During Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty.

PRCIS: Damage to disposable selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) lenses correlated with the amount of total laser energy. Furthermore, greater lens damage was associated with diminished patient treatment response. PURPOSE: Disposable SLT lenses have been observed to be damaged during use by laser, potentially affecting therapeutic response. This study sought to identify factors associated with the magnitude of lens damage and its effect on treatment outcomes. PATIENT AND METHODS: We analyzed 113 eyes from 82 patients who underwent SLT between 2020 and 2021 at an American academic medical center. For each procedure, we recorded baseline patient characteristics, procedure settings, physician age (as a possible factor causing laser defocus due to accommodation), and area of lens damage. Treatment response was calculated as the difference between preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: Area of lens damage was associated with greater total laser energy ( r =0.34, P <0.001) and greater mean energy per application ( r =0.37, P <0.001). IOP reduction decreased with increasing lens damage ( r =-0.19, P =0.022). Lens damage was not associated with patient characteristics indicative of glaucoma severity or user settings (physician age and slit lamp used). Greater IOP reduction was associated with higher preop IOP ( r =0.46, P <0.001) and a smaller cup-to-disc ratio ( r =0.22, P =0.036). IOP reduction was not associated with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, patient age, or the number of glaucoma medications. CONCLUSIONS: Increased laser damage to disposable SLT lenses was associated with diminished treatment effect. The amount of damage was correlated with total and average laser energy, but not patient or physician factors. Overall, these findings call for reconsideration of using disposable SLT lenses as part of routine practice.

Frenulum Protection Technique in Disposable Circumcision Suture Device for Adult Males.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of frenulum protection technique of the disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) in adult males. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Atotal of 53 adult males were diagnosed with redundant prepuce and underwent circumcision with DCSD using frenulum protection technique. The main preoperative and postoperative measure of the length of penile frenulum was evaluated. Other data such as edema rate, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, postoperative pain, staple falling off time, incision infection rate, and evaluation of satisfaction rate with penis appearance were documented in the study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative frenulum length for each patient. The mean length of the penile frenulum before and after surgery was 2.25 ± 0.36 cm and 2.23 ± 0.39 cm, respectively (p = .31). The rate of frenulum length preservation was 100%. All the patients had no excessive resection of the frenulum and no serious complication happened after surgery. The satisfaction rate of postoperative penis appearance from patients' evaluation was 98.1% (52/53). CONCLUSION: The frenulum protection technique was simple and operable, which could help the operator to accurately identify the most distal position of the frenulum and retain a sufficient length of frenulum during DCSD circumcision.

Environmental Impact Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Head Covers.

This life cycle assessment compares the environmental footprint of reusable surgical head covers with single-use disposable surgical head covers.

Survey of ESCRS members' attitudes toward operating room waste.

In a survey of ESCRS member cataract surgeons, 92% felt that operating room waste is excessive and should be reduced; 99% were concerned about global warming and climate change. Most respondents cited restrictions on reuse by manufacturers and regulatory bodies as major drivers of this waste. There was a strong desire to have more reusable options for instruments, devices, and supplies. In comparable percentages with an earlier survey of North American cataract surgeons using the identical questionnaire, there was a strong willingness to reuse many surgical supplies, as well as topical and intraocular medications. This was true even though ESCRS members were much more likely to practice in hospitals (68% vs 35%). The similarities of these results to the North American survey suggest that these attitudes toward sustainability are in fact global and universal. The strong concordance between the 2 surveys suggests that global collaboration is both possible and necessary.

Frugal indigenous vessel loop made from a surgical glove.

We report a simple cost effective alternative to commercially available vessel loops made from sterilized surgical gloves for retraction of vital structures during vascular trauma, micro-vascular, micro-neural surgery.

Single Use or Disposable Flexible Bronchoscopes: Bench Top and Preclinical Comparison of Currently Available Devices.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the risk of infection related to reusable bronchoscopes, the global drive toward disposable technology and the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an increase in the use and production of single use or disposable bronchoscopes. An in-depth comparison of all available devices has not been published. METHODS: A benchtop comparison of the Ambu®aScopeTM, Boston Scientific® EXALTTM Model B, the Surgical Company Broncoflex© Vortex, Pentax® Medical ONE Pulmo™, and Vathin® H-SteriscopeTM (all 2.8 mm inner dimension other than the Pentax single-use flexible bronchoscope (3 mm)) was undertaken including measurement of maximal flexion and extension angles, thumb force required and suction with and without biopsy forceps. Thereafter, preclinical assessment was performed with data collected including experience, gender, hand size, and scope preference. RESULTS: The Vathin single-use flexible bronchoscope had the biggest range of tip movement from flexion to extension with and without forceps. The Boston single-use flexible bronchoscope required the maximal thumb force but had the least reduction of tip movement with forceps. The Boston single-use flexible bronchoscope significantly outperformed all other scopes including the standard Pentax scope and was the only scope capable of suctioning pseudo-mucus around the forceps. Although there was no significant difference in preference in the overall group, females and those with smaller hand size preferred the Pentax and males the Broncoflex single-use flexible bronchoscope. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available single-use flexible bronchoscopes differ in several factors other than scope sizes and monitor including suction, turning envelope, and handle size. Performance in the clinical setting will be key to their success.

Disposable versus reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes: a national survey of UK ENT surgical trainees and a single-centre cost-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study primarily assessed ENT surgical trainees' preferences for the qualities of disposable and reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes. Secondary aims included eliciting trainees' views on ENT surgery and climate change, and creating a single-centre per-use cost analysis for disposable and reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was formulated. An online survey consisting of multiple-choice and Likert-scale questions was distributed nationally. Cost analysis was performed using 2021-2022 data from the host institution. RESULTS: Twenty-four trainees responded. Data on disposable fibre-optic nasendoscopes showed no difference in overall satisfaction (p = 0.244). Reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes had a lower cost per use compared with disposable nasendoscopes at 5 years (4.7 per cent reduction) and 10 years (7.1 per cent reduction). Of the trainees, 79.2 per cent were supportive of climate-friendly initiatives within ENT surgery, and 25 per cent felt supported by their departments. CONCLUSION: Trainees' satisfaction with disposable and reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes is similar. Cost analysis favours reusable fibre-optic nasendoscopes in the long term at the host institution. Empowering departments and trainees to pursue climate-friendly initiatives should be encouraged.

Variation in cost of disposable operating room supplies at a children's hospital.

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) costs account for 40% of hospital costs. Disposable supplies make up a portion of OR costs and are the only cost that is under control of the surgeon. There are little data to explain how surgeons select surgical supplies and what factors predict supply selection. Our goal with the current work was to assess variation in cost of disposable OR supplies at the surgeon level, hypothesizing high variability would be observed. STUDY DESIGN: Cost data were reviewed for the most common procedures performed by five surgical divisions at a single children's hospital over a six-month period in 2021. For each procedure, the average disposable OR costs for each surgeon were tabulated and compared to the median supply cost for a given procedure at the group level. RESULTS: For each procedure, the variation ranged from 149% (gastrostomy tube placement) to 758% (tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy). The median supply cost for an individual surgeon was not always above or below the median supply cost for that procedure for the group. No relationship was observed between whether the supply cost was above or below the median for a given case and a surgeon's case volume, years in practice, or operative length. There was also no relationship between surgeon volume and median cost, surgery length, and years of experience. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate variation in the cost of disposable OR supplies at the individual surgeon level at a single institution. This variation is not explained by case volume, years in practice, or operative length.

What a Waste! The Impact of Unused Surgical Supplies in Hand Surgery and How We Can Improve.

BACKGROUND: The US health care system is the second largest contributor of trash. Approximately 20% to 70% of waste is produced by operating rooms, and very few of this waste is recycled. The purpose of this study is to quantify the opened but unused disposable supplies and generate strategies to reduce disposable waste. METHODS: A single-center prospective study to evaluate the cost of opened but unused single-use operating room supplies was completed by counting the number of wasted disposable products at the end of hand surgery cases. We used χ2 test, t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and simple linear regression to assess the associations between patient and case variables and the total cost of wasted items. Environmentally Extended Input Output Life Cycle Assessment methods were used to convert the dollar spent to kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e), a measure of greenhouse gas emissions. RESULTS: Surgical and dressing items that were disposed of and not used during each case were recorded. We included 85 consecutive cases in the analysis from a single surgeon's practice. Higher cost from wasted items was associated with shorter operative time (P = .010). On average, 11.5 items were wasted per case (SD: 3.6 items), with a total of 981 items wasted over the 85 cases in the study period. Surgical sponges and blades were 2 of the most unused items. Wasted items amounted to a total of $2193.5 and 441 kg of CO2-e during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the excessive waste of unused disposable products during hand surgery cases and identifies ways of improvement.

Surgical Cost Awareness Program Study: Impact of a Novel, Real-Time, Cost Awareness Intervention on Operating Room Expenses in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: For surgical patients, operating room expenses are significant drivers of overall hospitalization costs. Surgical teams often lack awareness of the costs associated with disposable surgical supplies, which may lead to unnecessary expenditures. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a Surgical Cost Awareness Program would reduce operating room costs. STUDY DESIGN: A prototype software displays the types and costs of disposable instruments used in real-time during surgery and generates insight-driven operative cost reports, which are automatically sent to the surgeons. A prospective pre-post controlled trial of thoracoscopic lobectomy procedures performed by 7 surgeons at a single academic center was conducted. Control and intervention groups consisted of consecutive cases from February 2nd through June 23, 2021, and from June 28th through December 22, 2021, respectively. The primary outcome was mean per case surgical disposables cost. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-two lobectomies were evaluated throughout the study period (control: n = 164; intervention: n = 158). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean disposables cost per case was $3,320.73 ± $814.83 in the control group compared with $2,567.64 ± $594.59 in the intervention group, representing a mean cost reduction of $753.08 (95% CI, $622.29 to $883.87; p < 0.001). All surgeons experienced a reduction in disposable costs after the intervention. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Providing real-time educational feedback to surgical teams significantly reduced costs associated with disposable surgical equipment without compromising perioperative outcomes for lobectomy. Integrating the novel AssistIQ software across other procedural settings may generate further data insights with the potential for significant cost savings on a larger scale.

Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

INTRODUCTION: Climate change is one of the 21st century's biggest public health issues and health care contributes up to 10% of the emissions of greenhouse gases in developed countries. About 15 million laparoscopic procedures are performed annually worldwide and single-use medical equipment is increasingly used during these procedures. Little is known about costs and environmental footprint of this change in practice. METHODS: We employed Life Cycle Assessment method to evaluate and compare the environmental impacts of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies at three hospitals in southern Sweden. The environmental impacts were calculated using the IMPACT 2002+ method and a functional unit of 500 procedures. Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate differences between trocar systems. Data are presented as medians and 2.5th to 97.5th percentiles. Financial costs were calculated using Life Cycle Costing. RESULTS: The single-use system had a 182% higher impact on resources than the reusable system [difference: 5160 MJ primary (4400-5770)]. The single-use system had a 379% higher impact on climate change than the reusable system [difference: 446 kg CO2eq (413-483)]. The single-use system had an 83% higher impact than the reusable system on ecosystem quality [difference: 79 PDF*m2*yr (24-112)] and a 240% higher impact on human health [difference: 2.4x10-4 DALY/person/yr (2.2x10-4-2.6x10-4)]. The mixed and single-use systems had a similar environmental impact. Differences between single-use and reusable trocars with regard to resource use and ecosystem quality were found to be sensitive to lower filling of machines in the sterilization process. For ecosystem quality the difference between the two were further sensitive to a 50% decrease in number of reuses, and to using a fossil fuel intensive electricity mix. Differences regarding effects on climate change and human health were robust in the sensitivity analyses. The reusable and mixed trocar systems were approximately half as expensive as the single-use systems (17360 € and 18560 € versus 37600 €, respectively). CONCLUSION: In the Swedish healthcare system the reusable trocar system offers a robust opportunity to reduce both the environmental impact and financial costs for laparoscopic surgery.